Sunday, April 01, 2007

INLAND EMPIRE

"That was some fucked-up shit!"

That was the memorable, if coarse, one-sentence review of my friend, Goldie Heidi Gider, upon exiting a screening of "Memento" in Dupont Circle. I can only hope that Goldie never, EVER sees David Lynch's "Inland Empire" -- a film that will leave even die-hard fans of "Mulholland Drive" (like myself) 'puzzled,' if not totally 'f**ed-up. '

Make no mistake: "Inland Emprie" will "F*** You Up." The movie starts off promisingly enough: with a scene involving not one, but two "Seinfeld" alums -- Susan's mother, Mrs. Ross (affecting a thick Russian accent) and Mr. Pitt (!). But then it spends WAAY too much time setting up the premise: Laura Dern's actress character, Nikki, begins to shoot a movie with Justin Theroux and directed by Jeremy Irons (who, like a true British thespian, attacks his role like he's in a movie where it matters that he create a believable character -- bless his heart!). And he's working with a film crew that totals, by my count, four! Four people making a Hollywood studio release in a studio without lights? That's the most f-ed up part of this movie!

This section -- the first, interminable hour -- is dreadful: poorly, and cheaply, shot, without any of Lynch's trademark music score, and undone by the black hole of Harry Dean Stanton's "acting." I put that term in quotes because, if this man EVER had any acting talent (I still need to be convinced) he has most-certainly lost it in the intervening 20 years since he has appeared in anything of import. The man sucks the life out of every scene he is in!

But the main problem with this movie is Lynch's insistence on using that oh-so-hip new invention -- 'digital video.' Someone please tell me what the advantage is of being able to shoot out-of-focus close-ups of the individual beads of sweat on the pockmarked face of a character actor?? This is progress? Digital video makes even the lovely British actress Julia Ormond look homely!

Yet Lynch has declared this is the ONLY medium he will use from now on. I guess that means this is the last David Lynch film I will ever see -- unless he decides to make "Mulholland Drive 2."

The story is basically this: while shooting the 'remake' of a Polish movie that was abandoned after the two leads were murdered, Nikki has a fling with her co-star, spies on her jealous husband (also Polish), gets trapped in a parallel universe, travels in and out of portals (or 'wormholes,' for the sci-fi inclined) that represent her subconscious (the 'Inland Empire' of the title), where the incidents surrounding the earlier Polish film seem eerily familiar, and eventually trades places with the young girl who's been watching the whole story unfold on her TV. (And that's just the part I understood!)

Of course, I could be totally wrong about all of this -- the Inland Empire could be somewhere in Poland, I'll have to check my atlas -- but it doesn't really matter. In fact, you could come and go at any point during the film, and you would not gain (or lose) any understanding whatsoever. I had to smile when Lynch subtitled the Polish actor's dialogue: what's the point, when nothing they say makes sense in any language? The scenes in Poland actually have a more professional look, making me wish we were watching the filming of THAT movie, instead.

The movie picks up when Nikki gets trapped in a house nicely appointed with Fifties-era furniture, no doubt bought at the "Blue Velvet" garage sale. It is also nicely appointed with young, hot babes -- a halfway house for jilted exes of Justin Theroux's character (or not). They bring some life to this moribund tale: dancing to 'The Lo-co-motion;' showing each other their breasts....it's all good stuff. But soon, Nikki gets trapped in a Southern, white-trash existence, with that same Polish husband, where she gets a house call from -- who else? -- Mary Steenbergen! At this point, I would not have been surprised had she brought Ted Danson with her, wearing a giant rabbit head!

I haven't mentioned the giant talking rabbits, have I? I actually looked forward to seeing these three, dressed in human clothes, on a stage delivering their lines to an appreciative (if easily amused) audience. You know you are watching a BAD David Lynch film when you want to see more of the talking rabbits!

And I haven't even gotten to the WEIRD part! That comes at about the 2-hour, 40-minute mark, when any sane moviegoer with a sense of the preciousness of time would have walked out of the theater. It starts when Nikki walks through another sinister-looking hallway (will she ever learn?) and shoots a guy who we've seen earlier with a light bulb stuck in his mouth.

All credit goes to the fearlessness of Laura Dern--Lynch doesn't ask her to give a performance as much as perform a series of acting exercises (playing a white trash Southerner in one scene, an abused hooker in another, and at the film's climax, vomiting and bleeding to death on the dirty streets of Hollywood & Vine after being stabbed in the stomach with a screwdriver by 'Sabrina' (Ms. Ormond). I guarantee there is no acting school in the world that has taught that scene! FYI: That scene turns out to be part of Jeremy Iron's movie (remember him?), so I'm not spoiling anything. The aforementioned babes turn up as hookers on the same street.

The film ties together nicely at the end...strange for a movie that is complete nonsense for its 179 minute running time, and there is a "sweet" payoff in the last scene that is a must-see for you 'Mulholland' fans: a scene so cheeky and self-referential (involving, as far as I can tell, actors from previous Lynch films, including Natassja Kinski, the lovely Laura Elena Harring, and a babe with a prosthetic leg ... they seem to be everywhere these days, don't they?) that blows away the much-discussed final shot in "The Departed." The final credits reveal that Naomi Watts contributed a 'special vocal performance'... one of the talking rabbits, I suspect... and include a fun, energetic music video, as well (out-of-focus, naturally) that makes you wish the rest of the film had at least half of that spirit and inventiveness.

It speaks to the power of Lynch's vision that the five minutes of brilliance contained in this movie had me exiting the theater -- 'Back to Planet Earth' as one patron said -- thinking "I'm glad I saw that." Now, that is truly fucked-up!!

Saturday, March 31, 2007

The first TWO great movies of 2007

1) BREACH - a stellar performance by Chris Cooper as the real-life spy Robert Hanssen makes Billy Ray's latest expose on the dark side of Washington's power brokers (he did the compelling "Shattered Glass") a must-see. D.C. never looked so ... SNOWY! (It was filmed in Canada, except for some scenes with Laura Linney in the DC Metro). And the actress playing Ryan Phillippe's East-German hottie of a wife is a revelation, especially when you realize she is the very North American actress Caroline Dhavernas, star of Fox's all too-brief series 'Wonderland.'

2) ZODIAC -- another compelling film for intelligent filmgoers: more about the obsessiveness of solving a puzzle (in the great tradition of both 'All the President's Men' and 'J.F.K.') than about the real-life events that surround the story. As in "Breach," the film is propelled forward by a trio of riveting performances: Jake Gyllenhaal, Mark Ruffalo, Robert Downey, Jr. -- and actor who by all measures is at the top of his game. True to his previous films, David Fincher ("Se7en") films the Zodiac murders in agonizing, excruciating detail.

It is nice to see a movie that devotes so much attention to period details (from 1969-71): from the clothes to the music to the overhead shot of the downtown San Francisco construction site that was to become the Transamerica Tower. If the movie ends without resolution for any of the characters ... hey, reality bites!

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Two movies in 2007

TWO! That is all I've had time to see so far this year, what with seeing all the Oscar movies in January, and now catching up on the 2006 Foreign Films that are now in wide release. (I will devote a future post to them), and the usual glut of slasher flicks this time of year.

1. "Factory Girl" -- Sienna Miller is brilliant! She really 'burns up the screen' and is utterly convincing. It is unfortunate that the movie around her doesn't live up to her performance. Sure, Guy Pearce is an eerily-accurate Andy Warhol (right down to his skin -- which makes him look like a burn victim); and the movie pulls no punches depicting his behavior in a negative light. But consider this:

Problem #1: Casting. As in Jimmy Fallon, as Edie's gay, blue-blooded sidekick. He's still Jimmy Fallon, (ready to mug for the camera as if he's on SNL) and he's got no business being in the Sixties, hangin' out at the factory!

Problem #2: Casting, As in "WTF is Hayden Christiansen doing in this movie??" I know what he is trying to do (God love him) -- but he is completely unequipped to carry it off. His scenes make you cringe.

Problem #3: The director (George Hickenlooper): he is a documentarian, and he makes up for his lack of imagination by digging up every camera trick from 'Easy Rider' to denote drug use and the Swinging Sixties. Forty years ago, it was cool. Now it is lame.

2. "Puccini for Beginners" -- I had to love this movie because it is an indie, filmed in Manhattan, with a good cast and lots of witty, intellectual banter, with a passing reference to Opera! And coincidentally, I saw a movie last year at the Houston Film Festival fitting that description exactly (the clever, but shoe-string budgeted and a bit amateurish "I Will Avenge You, Iago!").

"Puccini" is a better movie, but still light as a feather. And don't be fooled, Opera lovers: the references to opera are very fleeting--it's the mark of a lazy screenwriter to make the lead an opera fan (so she must be sensitive) yet drop the conceit after one scene. And if I criticize 'Factory Girl' for reverting to 'Easy Rider'-era imagery, then it's only fair to call this film out for its repeated Annie Hall references: the 'strangers who join in on the conversation' trick works two of the ten times it is employed here.


The movie uses the streets of the Villages as its backgound -- the bookstores, movie theaters, and cafes-- and savvy Manhattanites (like me) can pinpoint exactly where they filmed (Greenwich Village Cinema on W. 12th!).

The cast is first-rate: I confess to being a huge Elizabeth Reaser fan (she was in "Stay" "The Family Stone" and last year's ISA winner "The Sweet Land"--a prize for you if you've seen even ONE of these! If you haven't, she has a four-episode 'arc' on Grey's Anatomy this season), stage actor Justin Kirk, and the hard-working, never successful Gretchen Mol. What sets this movie apart is having an openly bisexual protagonist who (shock!) has an active and fulfilling sex life! Instead of pandering to what it thinks a straight audience will accept by stripping the gay character of any sexual desires (Hollywood), or relegating him/her to a sex-obsessed comic relief sidekick (Hollywood again).

Sure, we've seen the lesbian romantic comedy before--"Kissing Jessica Stein"--but that was rather chaste, as I recall. And the genre can use another one or two--it has a lot of catching up to do.




Elizabeth Reaser

Monday, March 05, 2007

Saturday, February 24, 2007

OSCAR Want / Think

Category* / Want (to win) / Think (will win) / Winner
[* excluding the 3 shorts categories, since I didn't see any of them.]


Make-Up: Pan's Labyrinth / Pan's Labyrinth / Pan's L.
Visual Effects: [none] / Pirates of the Caribbean 2 / Pirates2
Costume Design: Dreamgirls / Dreamgirls / Marie Antoinette
Sound Mixing: Flags of our Fathers / Dreamgirls / D-girls
Sound Editing: Flags of our Fathers / Letters From Iwo Jima / Letters
Film Editing: Children of Men / The Departed / Departed
Cinematography: Children of Men / Children-Men / Pan's L.
Art Direction: Pan's Labyrinth / Pan's Labyrinth / Pan's L.
Original Score*: The Queen / The Queen / Babel
* best category: all nominees deserving
Original Song: "Love You I Do" (Dreamgirls) / "Listen" (Dreamgirls) / An Inconvenient Truth
Original Screenplay: The Queen / Little Miss Sunshine / LMS
Adapted Screenplay: Notes on a Scandal / The Departed / Departed

Documentary: An Inconvenient Truth/ Iraq in Fragments/ Truth
Animated Film: Happy Feet / Cars / Happy Feet
Foreign Film: Pan's Labyrinth / Pan's L / The Lives of Others

DIRECTOR: Martin Scorsese / Martin Scorsese / Marty
SUPP. ACTRESS: Rinko Kikuchi / Jennifer Hudson / J.Hud
SUPP. ACTOR: Jackie Earle Haley / Alan Arkin / A.Ark.
ACTRESS: Helen Mirren / Helen Mirren / Helen Mirren
ACTOR: Forest Whitaker / Forest Whitaker / Forest Whitaker
PICTURE: The Queen / Little Miss Sunshine / The Departed

Score: 13 (out of 21)

Friday, February 23, 2007

OSCAR tidbits

To whet your appetite for the Big Night (1996) here is a list of your favorites stars (and mine) who will be presenting awards during Sunday's telecast:

"The list of presenters includes Ben Affleck, Jessica Biel, Jack Black, Cate Blanchett, Abigail Breslin, Steve Carell, George Clooney, Daniel Craig, Tom Cruise, Penélope Cruz, Cameron Diaz, Kirsten Dunst, Will Ferrell, Jodie Foster, Eva Green, Tom Hanks, Anne Hathaway, Hugh Jackman, Diane Keaton, Nicole Kidman, Queen Latifah, Jennifer Lopez, Tobey Maguire, Gwyneth Paltrow, Jaden Christopher Syre Smith, John Travolta, Rachel Weisz, Kate Winslet, and Reese Witherspoon. As per the above list, no one who began working in films prior to 1970 will be giving out any awards. The veteran-est of the presenters is Diane Keaton, whose first film, Lovers and Other Strangers, came out in 1970."

And to help you fill-out those Oscar ballots, two IMPORTANT awards were handed out recently, news that may have flown under your radar:

1)
"Mexican-born Emmanuel Lubezki, one of filmdom’s top cinematographers, became the third non-American in a row to win the American Society of Cinematographers (ASC) feature-film award for his work in the Anglo-American production Children of Men.
According to
Variety, Lubezki’s win "further establish[es] the internationalization of a body that started doling out its own kudos partly in response to the large number of overseas cinematographers, many British, who were winning Oscars."
The trade magazine also names Mexico "as a hotbed of cinematic talent." Both Rodrigo Prieto (whose work on Babel has been highly praised) and Guillermo Navarro (who’s up for an
Academy Award, along with Lubezki, for El Laberinto del fauno / Pan’s Labyrinth) also hail from Mexico."

¡Que Viva México! (1932)

2)
"This past Sunday, the American Cinema Editors (ACE) picked two films — it was a tie — to receive the Eddie Award in the dramatic feature film category: Babel (Stephen Mirrione and Douglas Crise) and The Departed (Thelma Schoonmaker – her fourth Eddie). [Both are nominated for Oscars.]

Way to go, Thelma! ... & Louise (1991)

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Hey! AFI!

The American Film Institute recently sent out new ballots to 1,500 film critics (and others--I think Bill Clinton got to vote the last time), for “AFI’s 100 Years ... 100 Movies — 10th Anniversary Edition,” but I still haven't gotten my ballot! What gives?

Someone has to make sure that crap like Forrest Gump doesn't make the cut this time, as it did in your ill-conceived, flawed, and lame effort produced in 1997 ('Best Years of our Lives' #37? 'Tootsie' 'Dances with Wolves' and 'Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?' on the list at all?). For an excellent skewering of the original list, as well as an interesting alternate list, read Jonathan Rosenbaum.

If I did have a ballot in front of me, which ten would I chose? [Apparently, AFI compiles the list from everyone's Top Ten.] Well, I certainly wouldn't waste my votes on the ten 'automatics' that should and will appear on any list of this kind: Casablanca, Citizen Kane, Gone With the Wind, for starters; a representative example from directors such as A. Hitchcock, John Ford ("Grapes of Wrath"), Frank Capra, Billy Wilder ("Sunset Boulevard"), Scorsese ("Raging Bull" or "Taxi Driver"), Kubrick ("2001:A Space Odyssey" or "Dr. Strangelove"). And I would definitely make room for The Godfather and Chinatown, the two masterpieces of the Seventies. Those are all safe, as are other certifiable classics like The African Queen, Singin' in the Rain, and The Wizard of Oz. [I deliberately excluded Lawrence of Arabia, which was #5 for AFI: a great classic, but no one will convince me that it is in any way 'American.']

No, I would think more broadly, to save from obscurity some soon-to-be forgotten masterpieces -- forgotten by these young critics who are too lazy to look past their own navels to seek out (with "NetFlix" they don't even have to look past their navels, or get off their couches!) How else did "Star Wars" crack the Top 15 and "E.T". make it to #25? Tellingly, Spielberg must have more films on the list than any other director. Raiders of the Lost Ark came in one spot ahead of Vertigo for crying out loud!

My picks fall into three categories:

Black and white classics:
Notorious
Hud
The Last Picture Show
A Streetcar Named Desire
(I also have a soft spot for Bogart classics like "The Big Sleep" and "To Have and Have Not")

More 'recent' films
(everything is relative when you are in your forties)
The Conversation (Coppola)
Nashville (Altman)
Blue Velvet (Lynch)

Silents ... which were shamefully neglected the first time (except for 'Birth of a Nation' and two Chaplin classics):
Broken Blossoms (D.W. Griffith)
The General (Buster Keaton)
Sunrise (F.W. Murnau)

Of all these movies, only one even made AFI's original list in 1997! ("Streetcar" at a too low #45). The foregoing discussion is moot, of course -- not because I don't have a ballot -- but because AFI 'self-selected' a list of 400 movies for critics to choose from! I don't need no stinkin' list, AFI! I can choose my OWN top 100 without your "suggestions"!

I'm sure half of my list didn't even make AFI's cut of 400. Take a look at some of the 'new classics' they have added (they are so desperate for attention they go to these lengths to skew the vote to attract current moviegoers and to court controversy -- which corresponds to more 'ink' -- the real reason behind this exercise in stupidity):
A Beautiful Mind
American Beauty
Crash
Million Dollar Baby
Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl
Spiderman 2

I'll say this right now: if TWO Paul Haggis films crack the Top 100 (he wrote the screenplay to Million Dollar Baby), I am burning my AFI card, and sending them back the ashes!! (it expired in 2005, but they won't know that).

The new list will be announced in June (no doubt with a CBS Special). The way I see it, AFI has already blown their second chance to fix their mistakes.

Sunday, February 18, 2007

WORST OF 2006

There are so many movies I could put in this category for this particular year, I have to break it down into sub-categories:

First, the 'ehhh....' (as in 'what's all the fuss about?')
BLOOD DIAMOND (did anyone else feel like the moviemakers were using the tragedy of Sierra Leone as just another exotic backdrop for their action/adventure tale?)
LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE
HALF NELSON
VENUS

Second, the 'ambitious failures' (it tried, it had its merits, but it failed):
BABEL
FUR
MARIE ANTOINETTE

Next, the merely BAD:
The Black Dahlia
The DaVinci Code
Down in the Valley
Thank You For Smoking

Finally, the aggressively HORRIBLE movies:
6. Apocalypto
5. (tie) two documentaries that prove a good subject does not guarantee a good doc
- Stolen (about the famous Boston art heist of 1976)
- I'm Your Man (a tribute to Leonard Cohen)
4. Pirates of the Caribbean 2 -- lowest-common-denominator Hollywood 'product' at its worst; leave it to suits to ruin a franchise.
3. Clerks 2 (I'd rank it higher, but I don't want to give Kevin Smith the satisfaction. He wants viewers like me to be offended by his pushing the boundaries of taste. But I'm not offended by the subject matter: I'm offended because it's NOT FUNNY -- but rather a pathetic attempt by an aging sell-out to recapture the original spirit of his indie youth. Sad, really.
2. Art School Confidential - bad acting only compounds the misery of sitting through this cynical, misanthropic view of human nature ... and the 'art' that makes the protagonist famous? IT'S CRAP!! When you cannot even get that detail right -- GIVE UP!!

and the WORST MOVIE of the YEAR:
1. THE LOST CITY (aka "Andy Garcia's vanity pic")
Oh, what a misguided, amateurish effort! No doubt good intentions by all parties involved paved the way to this 'labor of love'; but make no mistake: by the end of these 140-interminable minutes, the road we have taken is to movie hell. If you last that long ... I admit I did not (and I never walk out on a movie!) But at the point where any competent movie-maker would be rolling the credits, Garcia needlessly switches the action to New York, and brings the ill-conceived Bill Murray character with him -- that's when I gave up. (Murray plays a character named "The Writer" -- 'nuff said).

Here is how New York Times critic Stephen Holden describes the filmmaking: 'clumsy' 'pulpy grandiosity' 'buffoonish parodies of Communists' and political discussion that doesn't rise above 'junior high level.' The same could be said of the director: you'd think Garcia would have learned more from the great directors he's worked with -- like, "don't steal other people's shots!" It's as if he thought every shot had to be 'iconic.' In the hands of an amateur, however -- the ripped-off Godfather 'drying sheets on a line' shot, or the black and white shot (except for the woman wearing the Cuban flag as a dress) for example -- the results are laughable. Like the acting.

Sunday, February 11, 2007

BEST OF 2006

At last . . .
My previous observation about 2006 being a weak year for movies has held true through the end of the movie season, so I am forced to break with tradition and combine my Top Ten List with my Best Foreign Films list, to bring you my TOP 15 MOVIE LIST. It is top-heavy with foreign films, but that's not my fault!

Only one movie this year earned the title of "Best Film of the Year," and that film is . . . . . .

1. PAN'S LABYRINTH (Mexico) - amazing and unforgettable
the rest:
2. THE QUEEN (UK)
3. TSOTSI (South Africa 2005)
4. VOLVER (Spain)
5. Cache (France)
6. The Departed
7. Stranger Than Fiction
8. La Moustache (France)
9. Running With Scissors
10. Children of Men
11. Inside Man
12. Little Children

13. The Painted Veil
14. Notes On A Scandal

15. Flags of our Fathers

Honorable mention (alpha):
Brick
Casino Royale
The Good Shepherd
Hollywoodland
Letters From Iwo Jima

Miss Potter
Tristram Shandy: A Cock & Bull Story
V for Vendetta


Saw & Enjoyed:
All the King's Men
The Good German
The Illusionist
The Lake House
The Last King of Scotland
Mission: Impossible: 3
A Prairie Home Companion
World Trade Center


Significant film missed: United 93

Notable documentaries:
1. An Inconvenient Truth
2. Wordplay
3. The Bridge

Coming soon: Worst Movies of 2006 !

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

Carping on the critics

[an occasional series where I take issue with something I've read.]

1) DAVID DENBY's blurb for "Dreamgirls" reads (breathlessly): "A Great Movie Musical Has Been Made At Last!"

AT LAST!?!? Where have you been, pal? Not one, but TWO movie musicals released in the past five years can legitimately lay claim to the title of 'Reinventing the Movie Musical,' and Dreamgirls is not in either's league. The two, Rob Marshall's Chicago (2002) and Baz Luhrmann's Moulin Rouge (2001) had originality and vision in every frame, sadly lacking in the lumbering "Dreamgirls." Instead, Bill Condon relies on every hackneyed convention of the stale, old movie musical.

Talk about a 'throwback': it is as if he deliberately ignored the last two decades of film history. And don't try to tell me he was "being true to the time in which it was set (1960's-early 70's) or debuted on Broadway (1980s)." Fidelity to time and place went out the window as soon as he staged that ill-conceived disco dance number involving rows of leather-clad, Village People-esque male dancers, when the time period surrounding that sequence (the clothes, hair, etc.) was clearly early Seventies, not Donna Summer disco late-Seventies!

Condon fails virtually every other time he shifts from dialogue to musical number: compare the clunky and stilted way the early number about "Family" begins (they all end up on a stage in a group hug) with ANY of the seamless transitions in Chicago. Every number is a bit too obviously pre-recorded, and poor Jamie Foxx is ill-served by his director: the hapless actor is reduced to standing in place while being sung to for long stretches of film time.

Many of my problems with the film can be blamed on the source material (that second act must be brutal to sit through in a theater), so why bother if you aren't bringing something new to it? Bill Condon is obviously talented -- remember Gods & Monsters? -- but his talents clearly DO NOT extend to movie musicals.