You can follow who I WANT to win in RED, followed by who I THINK will win in BLUE:
Best Picture
The Social Network
The King's Speech
Best Director
David Fincher
Best Actor
Colin Firth
Best Actress
Natalie Portman
Best Supporting Actor
Christian Bale
Best Supporting Actress
Amy Adams
Hailee Steinfeld
Best Original Screenplay
David Seidler, The King's Speech
Best Adapted Screenplay
Aaron Sorkin, The Social Network
Best Original Score
The Social Network
Best Original Song
"If I Rise" (127 Hours)
"We Belong Together" (Toy Story 3)
Best Animated Feature
Toy Story 3
Best Documentary Feature
Waste Land
Inside Job
Best Foreign Film
Dogtooth (Greece)
In a Better World (Denmark)
"Technical" Awards
Art Direction True Grit Alice In Wonderland
Cinematography True Grit
Costume Design I Am Love The King's Speech
Film Editing Black Swan The King's Speech
Make-Up The Way Back The Wolfman
Sound Editing Inception
Sound Mixing Salt The King's Speech
Visual Effects Inception
Occasional reviews of hard to find foreign and indie films (with a dose of mainstream, too)
Sunday, February 27, 2011
Thursday, February 03, 2011
TOP TEN FILMS OF 2010
The wait is over! Here is 'The List'! As in past years when I haven't seen enough (or enough good) foreign films to make separate lists, I have combined the two.
1. The Social Network -- no contest, the #1 movie of the year.
2. The King's Speech (UK) -- an admirable #2.
3. Toy Story 3 -- and I thought I had outgrown animated movies!
>>hey, the Oscars seem to have gotten it right, so far!
4. Un prophete (France 2009)
>>Okay, forget what I said about the Oscars; they completely blew last year's Best Foreign Film award by not giving it to this amazing and gritty film (or the other great film of last year, "The White Ribbon")
5. Black Swan
6. The Kids Are Alright
7. White Material (France 2010)
>>for some reason, even the Cesars (French Academy Awards) ignored this one!
8. True Grit
9. The Fighter
10. Inception
Honorable mention (aka "The Next Five"):
11. Red Riding Trilogy: Part One (UK) -- I don't care that this was a BBC miniseries; on the big screen, this installment was searing (thanks in no small part to the great chemistry between Andrew Garfield and Rebecca Hall).
12. Winter's Bone
13. The American -- I loved the pace of this movie!
14. I Am Love (Italy) -- Tilda Swinton in an Italian melodrama worthy of Visconti!
15. Shutter Island -- Marty & Leo, together again!
A solid list, I think (but there wasn't a lot of competition).
RON'S TOP TEN MOVIES FOR 2010
1. The Social Network -- no contest, the #1 movie of the year.
2. The King's Speech (UK) -- an admirable #2.
3. Toy Story 3 -- and I thought I had outgrown animated movies!
>>hey, the Oscars seem to have gotten it right, so far!
4. Un prophete (France 2009)
>>Okay, forget what I said about the Oscars; they completely blew last year's Best Foreign Film award by not giving it to this amazing and gritty film (or the other great film of last year, "The White Ribbon")
5. Black Swan
6. The Kids Are Alright
7. White Material (France 2010)
>>for some reason, even the Cesars (French Academy Awards) ignored this one!
8. True Grit
9. The Fighter
10. Inception
Honorable mention (aka "The Next Five"):
11. Red Riding Trilogy: Part One (UK) -- I don't care that this was a BBC miniseries; on the big screen, this installment was searing (thanks in no small part to the great chemistry between Andrew Garfield and Rebecca Hall).
12. Winter's Bone
13. The American -- I loved the pace of this movie!
14. I Am Love (Italy) -- Tilda Swinton in an Italian melodrama worthy of Visconti!
15. Shutter Island -- Marty & Leo, together again!
A solid list, I think (but there wasn't a lot of competition).
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Oscar Snubs: 2011 edition
I promised I wouldn't get upset anymore about the inevitable glaring omissions in the nominations list, but the more I think about this year, I can't help myself. This time, I will go a step further and call out the undeserving nominees who took away the spots earned by the following performances.
But first, a tip of the hat to all the nominations TRUE GRIT received, and to the recognition given Deadwood-alum John Hawkes for his work in WINTER'S BONE. Well done, Academy!
Category -- Snub-ee / should have replaced:
ACTRESS -- Julianne Moore / Nicole Kidman
>>I have already made clear my admiration for Ms. Moore's work in "The Kids Are All Right;" I haven't made public my opinion that the great Nicole Kidman has sabotaged her career as a 'serious' actress through cosmetic surgery. Sitting through the contemptible "Rabbit Hole," I couldn't get two thoughts out of my mind: 1) that's NICOLE KIDMAN sitting in a bowling alley in Yonkers with a bunch of average-looking people; and 2) for as emotional a performance as playing a grieving mother, why isn't the bottom of her face moving? Below her eyes, I saw no expression in her beautiful face. What a shame.
ACTOR -- Mark Wahlberg / Javier Bardem
>>Nothing against Javier (I haven't even seen "Biutiful") but Markie-Mark's subdued performance was the backbone of "The Fighter."
Supp. Actress -- Mila Kunis / Jackie Weaver
>>Raise your hand if you have seen "Animal Kingdom." My point exactly.
Supp. Actor -- Andrew Garfield / Jeremy Renner
>>Solid, but not award-worthy work by Renner in "The Town," a standard crime drama; Garfield's breakthrough performance was vital to the superior "The Social Network."
Two comments about the 'minor awards." How can "Waiting for Superman" not be recognized for Best Documentary? How can "Alice in Wonderland" receive 3 nominations, but NOT one for Best Make-Up!?!
And finally, it has become a tradition with me to go off on a rant against one particular nominee (usually in the Best Original Score category). This year, the Winner Is .... A.R. Rahman !! for "127 Hours."
Last year's deserving winner for "Slumdog Millionaire" merely recycled the music and energy that worked so well in the previous film. For a movie about the isolation and desperation of a hiker trapped by a boulder in the middle of nowhere, it could not have been more inappropriate! As with Danny Boyle's "look-at-me" directing style, it was ostentatious and needlessly distracting. Jai-O!
But first, a tip of the hat to all the nominations TRUE GRIT received, and to the recognition given Deadwood-alum John Hawkes for his work in WINTER'S BONE. Well done, Academy!
Category -- Snub-ee / should have replaced:
ACTRESS -- Julianne Moore / Nicole Kidman
>>I have already made clear my admiration for Ms. Moore's work in "The Kids Are All Right;" I haven't made public my opinion that the great Nicole Kidman has sabotaged her career as a 'serious' actress through cosmetic surgery. Sitting through the contemptible "Rabbit Hole," I couldn't get two thoughts out of my mind: 1) that's NICOLE KIDMAN sitting in a bowling alley in Yonkers with a bunch of average-looking people; and 2) for as emotional a performance as playing a grieving mother, why isn't the bottom of her face moving? Below her eyes, I saw no expression in her beautiful face. What a shame.
ACTOR -- Mark Wahlberg / Javier Bardem
>>Nothing against Javier (I haven't even seen "Biutiful") but Markie-Mark's subdued performance was the backbone of "The Fighter."
Supp. Actress -- Mila Kunis / Jackie Weaver
>>Raise your hand if you have seen "Animal Kingdom." My point exactly.
Supp. Actor -- Andrew Garfield / Jeremy Renner
>>Solid, but not award-worthy work by Renner in "The Town," a standard crime drama; Garfield's breakthrough performance was vital to the superior "The Social Network."
Two comments about the 'minor awards." How can "Waiting for Superman" not be recognized for Best Documentary? How can "Alice in Wonderland" receive 3 nominations, but NOT one for Best Make-Up!?!
Last year's deserving winner for "Slumdog Millionaire" merely recycled the music and energy that worked so well in the previous film. For a movie about the isolation and desperation of a hiker trapped by a boulder in the middle of nowhere, it could not have been more inappropriate! As with Danny Boyle's "look-at-me" directing style, it was ostentatious and needlessly distracting. Jai-O!
Thursday, January 20, 2011
FFG is Wrong Again!
The Oscar Foreign Film shortlist was announced, and I only got one* prediction right!
Here are the nine films still in the running:
Algeria, Hors la Loi (Outside the Law), Rachid Bouchareb, director
Canada, Incendies, Denis Villeneuve, director
Denmark, In a Better World, Susanne Bier, director
Greece, Dogtooth, Yorgos Lanthimos, director
Japan, Confessions, Tetsuya Nakashima, director
*Mexico, Biutiful, Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu, director
South Africa, Life, Above All, Oliver Schmitz, director
Spain, Tambien la Lluvia (Even the Rain), Iciar Bollain, director
Sweden, Simple Simon, Andreas Ohman, director
"The biggest surprise on the list is that Greece’s incest-filled, psychological torture film Dogtooth made the cut."
-- Those crazy Greeks! (I'm sure it won't make the final five by the staid Oscar committee).
"The shortlist will be winnowed down to the five nominees by specially invited committees in New York and Los Angeles. They will spend Friday, January 21, through Sunday, January 23, viewing three films each day and then casting their ballots."
-- Now that's my idea of a great weekend!
Here are the nine films still in the running:
Algeria, Hors la Loi (Outside the Law), Rachid Bouchareb, director
Canada, Incendies, Denis Villeneuve, director
Denmark, In a Better World, Susanne Bier, director
Greece, Dogtooth, Yorgos Lanthimos, director
Japan, Confessions, Tetsuya Nakashima, director
*Mexico, Biutiful, Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu, director
South Africa, Life, Above All, Oliver Schmitz, director
Spain, Tambien la Lluvia (Even the Rain), Iciar Bollain, director
Sweden, Simple Simon, Andreas Ohman, director
"The biggest surprise on the list is that Greece’s incest-filled, psychological torture film Dogtooth made the cut."
-- Those crazy Greeks! (I'm sure it won't make the final five by the staid Oscar committee).
"The shortlist will be winnowed down to the five nominees by specially invited committees in New York and Los Angeles. They will spend Friday, January 21, through Sunday, January 23, viewing three films each day and then casting their ballots."
-- Now that's my idea of a great weekend!
Sunday, January 09, 2011
The SEVEN best actresses of 2010
January 11, 2011 --
Yes, I said SEVEN! If the Academy wanted to shake things up, they should have increased the big four nominations by at least one each, instead of their stupid idea to up the Best Picture nominees to ten!
With all due respect to Nicole Kidman (Rabbit Hole) and Michele Williams (Blue Valentine), whose movies I have yet to see, here are, without question, the Seven Best Lead Performances by an Actress in 2010:
Annette Bening* & Julianne Moore, The Kids are All Right -- These two actresses are equally essential to the movie: I cannot imagine either would be as phenomenal if they didn't have the other. Both deserve recognition in the Lead Actress category.
Sally Hawkins, Made In Dagenham -- with every movie she stars in (too few, sadly), Sally Hawkins surprises me with her talent. Her face is so expressive, her acting so genuine, she is a true joy to watch.
Isabelle Huppert, White Material -- this French treasure never fails to deliver a compelling, fearless performance (she chooses her material very well). Here she plays a French plantation owner in an unnamed African country in the midst of a civil war, trying to hold her family's life together amid the chaos. You can't take your eyes off of her, as usual.
Jennifer Lawrence*, Winter's Bone -- the next three actresses all gave breakthough performances, none more surprising than this young actress (unknown, by me). Playing a mature teen (made head of her disadvantaged household by default) in the hellish backwoods of the Ozarks, she shows a grit and determination to hold her family together at all costs (I sense a theme here!)
Natalie Portman*, Black Swan -- nothing less than a tour-de-force performance, NP inhabits the paper-thin body (and fragile mind) a ballet dancer -- complete with all the rigors of toe-shoes, sore muscles and feet, and back-stabbing colleagues. You never once think she's an actor pretending to be a dancer. It is a transformation worthy of DeNiro!
Hailee Steinfeld, True Grit -- don't believe the bullshit tactic by the studio (Paramount) to increase their chances of a nomination by promoting her as a "supporting" actress. She is literally in every scene of the movie! It doesn't matter that she is young and unknown, the movie is about her character Mattie Ross as much as Winter's Bone is about Ree, and Hailee's performance is not only the equal to Jeff Bridges' Rooster Cogburn, she carries the movie. Don't take my word for it, either: the directors agree with me.
* I predict only three of the above-mentioned seven will actually receive a Best Actress Oscar nomination. It wouldn't be the Oscars if they didn't slight somebody in every category, would it?.
Yes, I said SEVEN! If the Academy wanted to shake things up, they should have increased the big four nominations by at least one each, instead of their stupid idea to up the Best Picture nominees to ten!
With all due respect to Nicole Kidman (Rabbit Hole) and Michele Williams (Blue Valentine), whose movies I have yet to see, here are, without question, the Seven Best Lead Performances by an Actress in 2010:
Annette Bening* & Julianne Moore, The Kids are All Right -- These two actresses are equally essential to the movie: I cannot imagine either would be as phenomenal if they didn't have the other. Both deserve recognition in the Lead Actress category.
Sally Hawkins, Made In Dagenham -- with every movie she stars in (too few, sadly), Sally Hawkins surprises me with her talent. Her face is so expressive, her acting so genuine, she is a true joy to watch.
Isabelle Huppert, White Material -- this French treasure never fails to deliver a compelling, fearless performance (she chooses her material very well). Here she plays a French plantation owner in an unnamed African country in the midst of a civil war, trying to hold her family's life together amid the chaos. You can't take your eyes off of her, as usual.
Jennifer Lawrence*, Winter's Bone -- the next three actresses all gave breakthough performances, none more surprising than this young actress (unknown, by me). Playing a mature teen (made head of her disadvantaged household by default) in the hellish backwoods of the Ozarks, she shows a grit and determination to hold her family together at all costs (I sense a theme here!)
Natalie Portman*, Black Swan -- nothing less than a tour-de-force performance, NP inhabits the paper-thin body (and fragile mind) a ballet dancer -- complete with all the rigors of toe-shoes, sore muscles and feet, and back-stabbing colleagues. You never once think she's an actor pretending to be a dancer. It is a transformation worthy of DeNiro!
Hailee Steinfeld, True Grit -- don't believe the bullshit tactic by the studio (Paramount) to increase their chances of a nomination by promoting her as a "supporting" actress. She is literally in every scene of the movie! It doesn't matter that she is young and unknown, the movie is about her character Mattie Ross as much as Winter's Bone is about Ree, and Hailee's performance is not only the equal to Jeff Bridges' Rooster Cogburn, she carries the movie. Don't take my word for it, either: the directors agree with me.
* I predict only three of the above-mentioned seven will actually receive a Best Actress Oscar nomination. It wouldn't be the Oscars if they didn't slight somebody in every category, would it?.
Friday, January 07, 2011
Fearless Oscar predictions
January 7, 2011 --
One of my New Year's resolutions is to do things early. So expect my annual Top Ten List on MLK's Birthday! And why should I wait for the Academy Award nominations to be announced? (January 25th, 7:30 a.m. Central). I will charge ahead with my predictions for who gets nominated -- in the Best Foreign-Language Film category.
This is easier than it sounds, now that the Academy has started announcing a "short list" for nominations in the Foreign Film and Documentary Feature category. Now, instead of waiting until nomination morning to be outraged by the Academy's unexplicable slights, we can be outraged two weeks in advance. For example, this year's short-list for Best Documentary does not include the well-received "Marwencol," "Sweetgrass," or "Joan Rivers: A Piece of Work." !
Who can forget the outrage that accompanied the foreign film short-list for 2008, when Romania's "Four Months, Three Weeks, Two Days" was excluded. The Outrage! It took me awhile to accept the fact that the whole system is rigged: each country can only submit one entry, so much of what gets chosen is dependent on favoritism, politics, etc. (like the World Cup selection). So this year, don't expect to see these foreign favorites nominated: I Am Love (Italy), White Material (France) or any of the "Dragon Tattoo" movies (released in 2009, but I'm sure Sweden could have nominated one). Instead, they have pinned their hopes on a movie called "Simple Simon." Go figure.
I haven't seen a short list yet, so I am making my choices based on the original list of 65 movies (including first time submissions from Ethiopia and Greenland!). Truthfully, I only chose movies I have heard of, so there may be some dark horses to emerge, but here goes:
Kawasaki's Rose (Czech) - since this is the only one of the 65 I have actually seen, I have to include it.
Of Gods and Men (France) - it's about monks. Good reviews.
Biutiful (Mexico) - actually a Mexico-Spain co-production, but it has a big name star and director behind it.
The Edge (Russia) - know nothing about it, but it has a Golden Globe nomination.
"Uncle Boonmee ..." (Thailand) - big winner at Cannes; I will spare you the actual Thai title and director's name.
That leaves Romania out in the cold -- again! But if one of these gets dropped, I would add Florian Serban's "If I Want to Whistle, I Whistle" (an award winner at Berlin). Other dark horses are:
- Denmark's Globe-nominated "In a Better World."
- Greece's experimental "Dogtooth"
- Turkey's "Bal" (Honey), also at Berlin.
Greece vs. Turkey: now that would be as brutal as a World Cup match!
One of my New Year's resolutions is to do things early. So expect my annual Top Ten List on MLK's Birthday! And why should I wait for the Academy Award nominations to be announced? (January 25th, 7:30 a.m. Central). I will charge ahead with my predictions for who gets nominated -- in the Best Foreign-Language Film category.
This is easier than it sounds, now that the Academy has started announcing a "short list" for nominations in the Foreign Film and Documentary Feature category. Now, instead of waiting until nomination morning to be outraged by the Academy's unexplicable slights, we can be outraged two weeks in advance. For example, this year's short-list for Best Documentary does not include the well-received "Marwencol," "Sweetgrass," or "Joan Rivers: A Piece of Work." !
Who can forget the outrage that accompanied the foreign film short-list for 2008, when Romania's "Four Months, Three Weeks, Two Days" was excluded. The Outrage! It took me awhile to accept the fact that the whole system is rigged: each country can only submit one entry, so much of what gets chosen is dependent on favoritism, politics, etc. (like the World Cup selection). So this year, don't expect to see these foreign favorites nominated: I Am Love (Italy), White Material (France) or any of the "Dragon Tattoo" movies (released in 2009, but I'm sure Sweden could have nominated one). Instead, they have pinned their hopes on a movie called "Simple Simon." Go figure.
I haven't seen a short list yet, so I am making my choices based on the original list of 65 movies (including first time submissions from Ethiopia and Greenland!). Truthfully, I only chose movies I have heard of, so there may be some dark horses to emerge, but here goes:
Kawasaki's Rose (Czech) - since this is the only one of the 65 I have actually seen, I have to include it.
Of Gods and Men (France) - it's about monks. Good reviews.
Biutiful (Mexico) - actually a Mexico-Spain co-production, but it has a big name star and director behind it.
The Edge (Russia) - know nothing about it, but it has a Golden Globe nomination.
"Uncle Boonmee ..." (Thailand) - big winner at Cannes; I will spare you the actual Thai title and director's name.
That leaves Romania out in the cold -- again! But if one of these gets dropped, I would add Florian Serban's "If I Want to Whistle, I Whistle" (an award winner at Berlin). Other dark horses are:
- Denmark's Globe-nominated "In a Better World."
- Greece's experimental "Dogtooth"
- Turkey's "Bal" (Honey), also at Berlin.
Greece vs. Turkey: now that would be as brutal as a World Cup match!
Sunday, December 26, 2010
Where Was I?
December 26, 2010 --
Oh yes, I'm supposed to be reviewing movies on this site.
What a disappointing mess of a movie. Is it a comedy? an 'Up In The Air' wannabe? a disease-of-the-week melodrama? or just an ill-conceived mish-mash of all of the above? I vote for Nos. 2 & 4: what begins as a story of an off-putting, cocky salesman morphs into a clunky Parkinson's disease awareness movie, then reverts to lame Viagra jokes for what passes for slapstick. Forget Ivan Reitman: this director can't even rip-off Judd Apatow effectively! Case in point: the Jonah Hill-role (i.e., the fat, horny sidekick) goes not to Jonah Hill, but to a fatter, un-funnier nobody named Josh Gad. Who?
Anne Hathaway does what she can to salvage this mess, but her talents deserve better.
I must confess a soft spot for Woody's London phase. No, he hasn't broken any new ground with Match Point and Scoop, but the change in locale has broadened his perspective somewhat. In his latest, he still relies on a tired premise: the mid-life crisis of a well-past mid-life Anthony Hopkins (a great actor wasted!) and the repercussions visited on his wife and adult daughter (a radiant Naomi Watts).
Woody's alter ego this time is Naomi's writer-husband, and unconvincing Josh Brolin, who begins an unconvincing affair with his neighbor, the much-younger Freida Pinto. (Why would she give up her life for this untalented schlub? This could only happen in Woody's world.) Naomi has the film's most genuine moments of vulnerability and regret, opposite her boss, played by Antonio Banderas.
The only message of the film (that I can gather) is that everyone is delusional, so you might as well delude yourself into being happy. For an existentialist like Woody, I consider that an optimistic outlook!
Oh yes, I'm supposed to be reviewing movies on this site.
LOVE & OTHER DRUGS
Dir: Edward Zwick
Dir: Edward Zwick
What a disappointing mess of a movie. Is it a comedy? an 'Up In The Air' wannabe? a disease-of-the-week melodrama? or just an ill-conceived mish-mash of all of the above? I vote for Nos. 2 & 4: what begins as a story of an off-putting, cocky salesman morphs into a clunky Parkinson's disease awareness movie, then reverts to lame Viagra jokes for what passes for slapstick. Forget Ivan Reitman: this director can't even rip-off Judd Apatow effectively! Case in point: the Jonah Hill-role (i.e., the fat, horny sidekick) goes not to Jonah Hill, but to a fatter, un-funnier nobody named Josh Gad. Who?
Anne Hathaway does what she can to salvage this mess, but her talents deserve better.
You Will Meet A Tall, Dark Stranger
Dir: Woody Allen
Dir: Woody Allen
I must confess a soft spot for Woody's London phase. No, he hasn't broken any new ground with Match Point and Scoop, but the change in locale has broadened his perspective somewhat. In his latest, he still relies on a tired premise: the mid-life crisis of a well-past mid-life Anthony Hopkins (a great actor wasted!) and the repercussions visited on his wife and adult daughter (a radiant Naomi Watts).
Woody's alter ego this time is Naomi's writer-husband, and unconvincing Josh Brolin, who begins an unconvincing affair with his neighbor, the much-younger Freida Pinto. (Why would she give up her life for this untalented schlub? This could only happen in Woody's world.) Naomi has the film's most genuine moments of vulnerability and regret, opposite her boss, played by Antonio Banderas.
The only message of the film (that I can gather) is that everyone is delusional, so you might as well delude yourself into being happy. For an existentialist like Woody, I consider that an optimistic outlook!
Thursday, September 02, 2010
Best Films of the Summer!
August 31st --
Yes, the summer is officially OVER!
Time to recap the movie season, and I have to say, it was a GOOD summer at the movies! (A statement I rarely make).
Here are my Top Seven movies of the summer:
1. INCEPTION
2. TOY STORY 3
3. THE KIDS ARE ALL RIGHT
4. SALT
5. WINTER'S BONE
6. IRON MAN 2
7. ROBIN HOOD
I know what you're thinking: "Winter's Bone? WTF? That doesn't sound like a summer movie!" Trust me: another Sundance darling, it is this year's Frozen River -- a gritty, unsentimental look at 'rural' America (as seen through the lens of a indie filmmaker, that is). Sure, that has proven to be a recipe for disaster (just look at the misbegotten Junebug or the ouevre of David Gordon Green). I've never been to the Missouri Ozarks, so I cannot vouch for Winter's Bone's authenticity, but this film adheres to its vision from the start -- in the same way last year's Gone Baby Gone brought you into the heart of South Boston. It just feels right. Newcomer Jennifer Lawrence deserves the lion's share of the credit for carrying the movie with her lead performance.
Speaking of indie filmmakers, Lisa Cholodenko defies all expectations with her latest: The Kids Are All Right. As a lesbian raising a family with her partner in real life, one would expect her to make an affirmative, totally-positive portrait of this new nuclear family: two lesbians raising well-adjusted teens who are the product of an anonymous sperm-donor. One would be wrong! Instead, she gives us a warts-and-all look at confused teens whose relationship with their parents is exactly like a 'traditional' family's, i.e., dysfunctional. The fault lines between a couple (the excellent duo of Annette Bening and Julianne Moore, the two bravest actresses working today!) who have settled into a comfortable (boring) marriage are also exposed when the teens decide to invite the sperm donor into their lives.
This is where Hollywood takes over: the donor looks NOTHING LIKE David Crosby!! (a Melissa Etheridge reference, in case you don't know). Played to perfection by Mark Ruffalo, he is a cocky charmer, "pleased with himself" (as one of the moms comments). But he is as confused as the rest of the family as to the role he is supposed to play in this family dynamic.
SPOILER ALERT (in RED):
It was uncomfortable watching one of the Mom's fall into a heterosexual relationship with him. Together with another scene I won't reveal, it left this hetero viewer with the uneasy impression that lesbians can switch teams with ease.
That aside, it is ultimately a much bolder statement to make that this same-sex marriage is just like all other marriages -- a minefield of shifting emotions that survive or fail on the commitment of two people. (He says confidently, having never been married).
I won't dwell on the 3 obvious blockbusters on my list, other than to say Angelina Jolie stands alone among actresses who could pull off a role like SALT. Originally written for Tom Cruise, I can't even think of a male actor working today (other than Daniel Day Lewis) who could have brought the ambiguity required to make this somewhat preposterous story believable. I, for one, was genuinely convinced that the filmmakers pulled the rug out from under its audience midway through this Bourne-like juggernaut of a movie. But just how preposterous is this story of a network of Russian spies living ordinary lives in America? (It wins the award for topicality, hands down).
Nobody can pull the rug out from under an audience like Christopher Nolan , director of the summer's most-talked about movie: INCEPTION. I feel like I am the last blogger to weigh-in on this movie (according to A.O. Scott's New York Times story, I am). Let me come down firmly on the side of the film's supporters, for while the movie falls short of the mind-blowing thrill of The (original) Matrix, the intricate puzzle Nolan creates is always gripping to watch. Marvel at, really, for it is a tour de force of storytelling (that has always been his strong suit).
SPOILER ALERT (in RED): Sure, this particular story left me with more questions than answers (Did they really need SIX people to enter that guy's head? How was that one dude able to change his appearance? And what's with all the snow? -- I lost track of whose dream we were in at that point). Questions aside, the show-stopping set-piece of the film is a half-hour sequence that deftly intercuts between three separate dreams (maybe four). Time slows down as you go down each level, so each sequence runs at a different speed. As you watch a 20-minute sequence on one level, the top level dream is only running for 2 seconds. Nolan's gift is that the viewer never gets lost: as the action escalates on two separate levels of storytelling, Nolan repeatedly returns to a van slowly falling backwards over a bridge into a river, thus grounding the audience in a sort of 'present.' Needless to say, it is the longest two seconds in film history. But it is brilliant!
I'm glad I am not the only person to recognize the film's similarities with DiCaprio's previous release, Martin Scorsese's Shutter Island (I just cannot articulate it as well as A.O. Scott: "In both films Mr. DiCaprio plays a troubled professional with a shaky grip on reality and an unresolved, guilt-tinged relationship with his vanished and beloved wife.") That wife is played stunningly in each film by Michele Williams and Marian Cotillard, respectively. The plot twist in Scorsese's film was a tad obvious -- especially to anyone who remembers the silent German classic The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (and I know film buff Scorsese certainly does!).
Nolan, on the other hand, introduces a subtle feeling of doubt before the big finale, but the possibility that is implanted (incepted?) in the viewer's brain by Cotillard's character in no way diminishes the impact of the final shot. Not since Andrei Tarkovsky's Stalker (1979) has a last shot packed such a wallop (Scorsese may be the only film buff to catch that obscure reference!). In Stalker, that was because after 2 hours and 40 minutes of watching nothing happen, suddenly something happens!
Inception is a mere 2 hours and 22 minutes, and the satisfying final twist has its own logic to it: like Nolan's true 'masterpiece,' Memento, the movie couldn't end any other way. I don't see that as a cop-out, or a contrivance, as much as a payoff -- a reward for going along this far down the director's rabbit hole.
Yes, the summer is officially OVER!
Time to recap the movie season, and I have to say, it was a GOOD summer at the movies! (A statement I rarely make).
Here are my Top Seven movies of the summer:
1. INCEPTION
2. TOY STORY 3
3. THE KIDS ARE ALL RIGHT
4. SALT
5. WINTER'S BONE
6. IRON MAN 2
7. ROBIN HOOD
I know what you're thinking: "Winter's Bone? WTF? That doesn't sound like a summer movie!" Trust me: another Sundance darling, it is this year's Frozen River -- a gritty, unsentimental look at 'rural' America (as seen through the lens of a indie filmmaker, that is). Sure, that has proven to be a recipe for disaster (just look at the misbegotten Junebug or the ouevre of David Gordon Green). I've never been to the Missouri Ozarks, so I cannot vouch for Winter's Bone's authenticity, but this film adheres to its vision from the start -- in the same way last year's Gone Baby Gone brought you into the heart of South Boston. It just feels right. Newcomer Jennifer Lawrence deserves the lion's share of the credit for carrying the movie with her lead performance.
Speaking of indie filmmakers, Lisa Cholodenko defies all expectations with her latest: The Kids Are All Right. As a lesbian raising a family with her partner in real life, one would expect her to make an affirmative, totally-positive portrait of this new nuclear family: two lesbians raising well-adjusted teens who are the product of an anonymous sperm-donor. One would be wrong! Instead, she gives us a warts-and-all look at confused teens whose relationship with their parents is exactly like a 'traditional' family's, i.e., dysfunctional. The fault lines between a couple (the excellent duo of Annette Bening and Julianne Moore, the two bravest actresses working today!) who have settled into a comfortable (boring) marriage are also exposed when the teens decide to invite the sperm donor into their lives.
This is where Hollywood takes over: the donor looks NOTHING LIKE David Crosby!! (a Melissa Etheridge reference, in case you don't know). Played to perfection by Mark Ruffalo, he is a cocky charmer, "pleased with himself" (as one of the moms comments). But he is as confused as the rest of the family as to the role he is supposed to play in this family dynamic.
SPOILER ALERT (in RED):
It was uncomfortable watching one of the Mom's fall into a heterosexual relationship with him. Together with another scene I won't reveal, it left this hetero viewer with the uneasy impression that lesbians can switch teams with ease.
That aside, it is ultimately a much bolder statement to make that this same-sex marriage is just like all other marriages -- a minefield of shifting emotions that survive or fail on the commitment of two people. (He says confidently, having never been married).
I won't dwell on the 3 obvious blockbusters on my list, other than to say Angelina Jolie stands alone among actresses who could pull off a role like SALT. Originally written for Tom Cruise, I can't even think of a male actor working today (other than Daniel Day Lewis) who could have brought the ambiguity required to make this somewhat preposterous story believable. I, for one, was genuinely convinced that the filmmakers pulled the rug out from under its audience midway through this Bourne-like juggernaut of a movie. But just how preposterous is this story of a network of Russian spies living ordinary lives in America? (It wins the award for topicality, hands down).
Nobody can pull the rug out from under an audience like Christopher Nolan , director of the summer's most-talked about movie: INCEPTION. I feel like I am the last blogger to weigh-in on this movie (according to A.O. Scott's New York Times story, I am). Let me come down firmly on the side of the film's supporters, for while the movie falls short of the mind-blowing thrill of The (original) Matrix, the intricate puzzle Nolan creates is always gripping to watch. Marvel at, really, for it is a tour de force of storytelling (that has always been his strong suit).
SPOILER ALERT (in RED): Sure, this particular story left me with more questions than answers (Did they really need SIX people to enter that guy's head? How was that one dude able to change his appearance? And what's with all the snow? -- I lost track of whose dream we were in at that point). Questions aside, the show-stopping set-piece of the film is a half-hour sequence that deftly intercuts between three separate dreams (maybe four). Time slows down as you go down each level, so each sequence runs at a different speed. As you watch a 20-minute sequence on one level, the top level dream is only running for 2 seconds. Nolan's gift is that the viewer never gets lost: as the action escalates on two separate levels of storytelling, Nolan repeatedly returns to a van slowly falling backwards over a bridge into a river, thus grounding the audience in a sort of 'present.' Needless to say, it is the longest two seconds in film history. But it is brilliant!
I'm glad I am not the only person to recognize the film's similarities with DiCaprio's previous release, Martin Scorsese's Shutter Island (I just cannot articulate it as well as A.O. Scott: "In both films Mr. DiCaprio plays a troubled professional with a shaky grip on reality and an unresolved, guilt-tinged relationship with his vanished and beloved wife.") That wife is played stunningly in each film by Michele Williams and Marian Cotillard, respectively. The plot twist in Scorsese's film was a tad obvious -- especially to anyone who remembers the silent German classic The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (and I know film buff Scorsese certainly does!).
Nolan, on the other hand, introduces a subtle feeling of doubt before the big finale, but the possibility that is implanted (incepted?) in the viewer's brain by Cotillard's character in no way diminishes the impact of the final shot. Not since Andrei Tarkovsky's Stalker (1979) has a last shot packed such a wallop (Scorsese may be the only film buff to catch that obscure reference!). In Stalker, that was because after 2 hours and 40 minutes of watching nothing happen, suddenly something happens!
Inception is a mere 2 hours and 22 minutes, and the satisfying final twist has its own logic to it: like Nolan's true 'masterpiece,' Memento, the movie couldn't end any other way. I don't see that as a cop-out, or a contrivance, as much as a payoff -- a reward for going along this far down the director's rabbit hole.
Sunday, August 29, 2010
I'm in mourning
August 29th --
It is a sad day for Houston film lovers: the Angelika Houston has shut its doors -- forever! Apparently, the employees were as clueless as the general public. I should have guessed something was up when the online schedule stopped after Tuesday (Aug. 31st). But now how am I ever going to see "Farewell," "Cairo Time," and "Life During Wartime"?
It is a sad day for Houston film lovers: the Angelika Houston has shut its doors -- forever! Apparently, the employees were as clueless as the general public. I should have guessed something was up when the online schedule stopped after Tuesday (Aug. 31st). But now how am I ever going to see "Farewell," "Cairo Time," and "Life During Wartime"?
Tuesday, June 08, 2010
Bring Me the Head of Rodrigo Garcia
JUNE 8, 2010 --
Nothing gets foreignfilmguy's juices flowing more than an aggressively bad movie -- not a campy bad movie, or lowest-common-denominator, make-a-quick-buck bad, or bloated Hollywood mega-production bad -- I'm talking earnest, "let's make a statement movie" bad! Readers, I give you "Mother & Child."
This ill-conceived attempt at filmmaking labors on at a painfully bloated 120-minutes, and arrives stillborn (that's it for my childbirth references, I promise). If I were to "pitch" a movie as a cross between "Juno" and "Crash" I'd be laughed out of every film studio in Hollywood. Except one, apparently, and that is how this misbegotten movie got made.
I am not exaggerating when I make that comparison, for the movie inartfully tries to mesh the story of a pregnant teen who somehow gets it in her head that she is empowered to chose which parents are worthy of the child she is about to give up for adoption, with a strained, let's cast every out -of-work 'ethnic' actor we can find and have their stories crash together conceit that only exists inside a screenwriter's head. At least in Crash, those characters existed in a specific and palpable place and time: a seething Los Angeles of today. The current movie is so poorly made that its characters exist in a cinematic void--a black hole of "we can't afford extras in this scene, so let's pretend everybody in the office went home." (The extras they do employ are noticeably bad actors, so perhaps they made a virtue out of necessity).
The office in question is a supposedly high-powered LA law firm run by the woefully miscast Samuel L. Jackson, who hires the equally miscast Naomi Watts as a driven, amoral single attorney who is adopted (otherwise she wouldn't fit neatly into the script's outline!) and is supposed to be such a hot-shot she can move from firm to firm every three years and still be hired on the spot -- not that the screenwriters would ever stoop to show her in action (that would screw up their carefully-crafted plotline!). They might as well be the only two employees in the firm, for all the mis-en-scene we get from their stilted office scenes together. [Another case in point: when Jackson invites his new hire to a firm welcoming party, he takes up valuable screentime to explain that he didn't invite the other partners because they are 'boring' (not that the director was too lazy or cheap to populate the scene with believable background players).]
The other main character is the teen-mother who long ago gave-up Watts' character for adoption, an event which has haunted her ever since. Now well-past middle age and caring for her dying mother, this embittered, unlikeable woman is the ONLY character with any hint of reality to her ... due solely to the fearless performance by Annette Bening, who alone is able to breathe life into these lifeless, thin as the paper they are under-written on characters. If I come across as too harsh on the screenwriter, let me offer two examples:
1) the great Samuel L. Jackson is asked to play a name partner in a law firm who is seduced -- no, mounted -- fully-clothed, by the lovely Aussie actress Naomi Watts, who orders him not to move during intercourse, all the while keeping his Tucker Carlson bow-tie fully tied. There are so many things wrong with that scene, I wouldn't know where to begin. (Nobody benefits from a scene like that, that's all I'll say).
2) the gratuitous introduction, mid-story, of a wise beyond her years teen character (Juno again!) to interact with the now-pregnant, now suddenly warm and outgoing Ms. Watts -- only the teenager is blind! The blind who can see -- get it? I would make a crack about 'Screenwriting 101' class here, but if I ever came across a script like this in any kind of class, I'd give it a big red 'F.' Why? Because I assure you nothing that comes out these characters' mouths have ever been spoken by a real human being. Ever. They aren't people at all, merely fictional constructs that exist only to further the script's tortured path to its big statement.
Yet the only "statement" Director Garcia seems to want to make is: "Being a mother can turn the most-coldblooded, shut-off woman into a sensitive, caring soul." Early on I sensed the entire course this movie would take; then it dawned on me how far I had to go to get there. Let me say it was the longest 2 hours of my life. I know, certain females might say, "If you were a woman, you'd appreciate the message more." To that I reply: "Well who the hell is Rodrigo Garcia? I'm just as much a mother as he ever will be!" If I were a woman, I'd be offended by such a simple-minded screenplay, blatantly designed to manipulate my maternal instincts. In fact, the only thing Garcia has that I don't is well-connected friends -- the acclaimed directors Alfonso Cuaron, Guillermo del Toro and Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu are ALL listed in the credits.
Which leads me to comment on the film's Crash- and Babel-worthy casting:
- Jimmy Smits as a too decent to be true co-worker I have no complaints with (his platitude-spouting daughter is another story, however);
- the many African-American actors who populate the pregnant teen's world are all one-dimensional, yes, but not offensive;
- the Hispanic housekeeper/caretaker of the old woman who stays on to help the hostile daughter (Bening) against both her and her own daughter's self-interest, is purely a plot device;
- but when Elizabeth Peña pops-up in two throw-away scenes that could have been portrayed by any anonymous character actor, regardless of race, sex, creed or gender identification, this critic must say "No mas!" You really are plumbing the depths of pandering to an ethnic group when your casting Rolodex lands on Elizabeth Peña!
In fact, coming out of the theater, I tried to think of the last time I has such a miserable experience watching a film made by amateurs. Then it dawned on me: "The Lost City" (2005) directed by actor Andy Garcia. (New Rule: If your name is Garcia, you are forbidden from making a movie ... ever). That film has many things in common with this one: cardboard characters, simplistic plot, egregious miscasting (remember Bill Murray AND Dustin Hoffman?), an interminable running time, and , of course ...
Mother & Child
Director & Writer: Rodrigo Garcia
Director & Writer: Rodrigo Garcia
Nothing gets foreignfilmguy's juices flowing more than an aggressively bad movie -- not a campy bad movie, or lowest-common-denominator, make-a-quick-buck bad, or bloated Hollywood mega-production bad -- I'm talking earnest, "let's make a statement movie" bad! Readers, I give you "Mother & Child."
This ill-conceived attempt at filmmaking labors on at a painfully bloated 120-minutes, and arrives stillborn (that's it for my childbirth references, I promise). If I were to "pitch" a movie as a cross between "Juno" and "Crash" I'd be laughed out of every film studio in Hollywood. Except one, apparently, and that is how this misbegotten movie got made.
I am not exaggerating when I make that comparison, for the movie inartfully tries to mesh the story of a pregnant teen who somehow gets it in her head that she is empowered to chose which parents are worthy of the child she is about to give up for adoption, with a strained, let's cast every out -of-work 'ethnic' actor we can find and have their stories crash together conceit that only exists inside a screenwriter's head. At least in Crash, those characters existed in a specific and palpable place and time: a seething Los Angeles of today. The current movie is so poorly made that its characters exist in a cinematic void--a black hole of "we can't afford extras in this scene, so let's pretend everybody in the office went home." (The extras they do employ are noticeably bad actors, so perhaps they made a virtue out of necessity).
The office in question is a supposedly high-powered LA law firm run by the woefully miscast Samuel L. Jackson, who hires the equally miscast Naomi Watts as a driven, amoral single attorney who is adopted (otherwise she wouldn't fit neatly into the script's outline!) and is supposed to be such a hot-shot she can move from firm to firm every three years and still be hired on the spot -- not that the screenwriters would ever stoop to show her in action (that would screw up their carefully-crafted plotline!). They might as well be the only two employees in the firm, for all the mis-en-scene we get from their stilted office scenes together. [Another case in point: when Jackson invites his new hire to a firm welcoming party, he takes up valuable screentime to explain that he didn't invite the other partners because they are 'boring' (not that the director was too lazy or cheap to populate the scene with believable background players).]
The other main character is the teen-mother who long ago gave-up Watts' character for adoption, an event which has haunted her ever since. Now well-past middle age and caring for her dying mother, this embittered, unlikeable woman is the ONLY character with any hint of reality to her ... due solely to the fearless performance by Annette Bening, who alone is able to breathe life into these lifeless, thin as the paper they are under-written on characters. If I come across as too harsh on the screenwriter, let me offer two examples:
1) the great Samuel L. Jackson is asked to play a name partner in a law firm who is seduced -- no, mounted -- fully-clothed, by the lovely Aussie actress Naomi Watts, who orders him not to move during intercourse, all the while keeping his Tucker Carlson bow-tie fully tied. There are so many things wrong with that scene, I wouldn't know where to begin. (Nobody benefits from a scene like that, that's all I'll say).
2) the gratuitous introduction, mid-story, of a wise beyond her years teen character (Juno again!) to interact with the now-pregnant, now suddenly warm and outgoing Ms. Watts -- only the teenager is blind! The blind who can see -- get it? I would make a crack about 'Screenwriting 101' class here, but if I ever came across a script like this in any kind of class, I'd give it a big red 'F.' Why? Because I assure you nothing that comes out these characters' mouths have ever been spoken by a real human being. Ever. They aren't people at all, merely fictional constructs that exist only to further the script's tortured path to its big statement.
Yet the only "statement" Director Garcia seems to want to make is: "Being a mother can turn the most-coldblooded, shut-off woman into a sensitive, caring soul." Early on I sensed the entire course this movie would take; then it dawned on me how far I had to go to get there. Let me say it was the longest 2 hours of my life. I know, certain females might say, "If you were a woman, you'd appreciate the message more." To that I reply: "Well who the hell is Rodrigo Garcia? I'm just as much a mother as he ever will be!" If I were a woman, I'd be offended by such a simple-minded screenplay, blatantly designed to manipulate my maternal instincts. In fact, the only thing Garcia has that I don't is well-connected friends -- the acclaimed directors Alfonso Cuaron, Guillermo del Toro and Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu are ALL listed in the credits.
Which leads me to comment on the film's Crash- and Babel-worthy casting:
- Jimmy Smits as a too decent to be true co-worker I have no complaints with (his platitude-spouting daughter is another story, however);
- the many African-American actors who populate the pregnant teen's world are all one-dimensional, yes, but not offensive;
- the Hispanic housekeeper/caretaker of the old woman who stays on to help the hostile daughter (Bening) against both her and her own daughter's self-interest, is purely a plot device;
- but when Elizabeth Peña pops-up in two throw-away scenes that could have been portrayed by any anonymous character actor, regardless of race, sex, creed or gender identification, this critic must say "No mas!" You really are plumbing the depths of pandering to an ethnic group when your casting Rolodex lands on Elizabeth Peña!
In fact, coming out of the theater, I tried to think of the last time I has such a miserable experience watching a film made by amateurs. Then it dawned on me: "The Lost City" (2005) directed by actor Andy Garcia. (New Rule: If your name is Garcia, you are forbidden from making a movie ... ever). That film has many things in common with this one: cardboard characters, simplistic plot, egregious miscasting (remember Bill Murray AND Dustin Hoffman?), an interminable running time, and , of course ...
ELIZABETH f*cking PEñA!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)