Thursday, January 22, 2009

OSCAR slights

January 22, 2009 --

SALLY HAWKINS* WAS ROBBED!!

* Best Actress, "Happy-Go-Lucky"
(she was ignored by the SAGs, too, so I blame those 'dumb' actors)

'The Boss' Bruce Springsteen was likewise snubbed (I don't know who to blame for that).

Complete list of nominees


Check out MY TOP TEN LIST, to be announced here by the end of the month!!

Thursday, January 08, 2009

Quick Movie Takes: pre-Golden Globes

The Golden Globe awards are this Sunday (!) and I still haven't seen any of the movies nominated for BEST PICTURE (DRAMA), so I will have to limit my critique to the TV nominations:

Yea! "In Treatment" (HBO) got recognition for its fine supporting cast: Blair Underwood and the especially fine Melissa George (remember her in 'Alias'?).
"John Adams" (HBO) got its requisite nods, but I predict the Foreign Press won't be so enamored of American History as the lame Emmy voters were; look for an upset by the cast of "Bernard & Doris" (also HBO). [I was wrong--ffg]. I'm also pulling for Laura Dern's dead-on hilarious take of Katherine Harris in "Recount" (HBO again).

On the movie side, I can only predict one shoe-in (if there is any justice) [and there is!--ffg] : Brit Sally Hawkins in


"Happy Go Lucky"
(D: Mike Leigh)

She is brilliant in this gem of a movie. It is a character-study of a single personality-type: the relentless optimist. Leigh's genius is in proving that their lives are as deserving of exploration as anyone else. But 'Poppy' (Hawkins' character, appropriately an elementary school teacher) is no Candide: she recognizes the injustices, indifference, frustrations and anger that is ever-present in the society around her: she simply chooses not to let it affect her present mood or her long-term outlook on life. It sounds simple, but in Leigh's London -- populated by a dazzling array of 'kooks' -- it is a subversive triumph.

A couple of scenes are worth noting, for opposite reasons: 1) Poppy attends a beginner's Flamenco class with a co-worker, taught by a stern Spanish woman who is absolutely hilarious; 2) the one scene in the movie that doesn't work involves a deranged homeless man that is at once strained, unnecessary, and totally pointless (you'll know what I'm talking about when you see it). Cut that scene out and I'd rate this movie even higher in my Top Ten.


"Changeling"
(D: Clint Eastwood)

Angelina Jolie gets more ink as a real life Mom than she does as an actress, but her last two 'serious' roles proves that her real life has elevated her screen life to new heights. She was convincing as both wife and mother Marianne Pearl in the maligned "A Mighty Heart" " last year, and she shows added depth as a single mother in this other true life story (based on actual events involving the L.A.P.D in the 1920s--is there no end to the seediness of that police department?).

One woman's struggle for justice against this corrupt (all-male, naturally) machine is courageous to the point of unbelievability, but it really happened! Eastwood is faithful TO A FAULT to her ordeal: the scenes in the county mental hospital are straight out of "The SnakePit" that "Frances" was sent (the poor actresses playing the nurses act like there heart is not in it: Where's Nurse Ratched when you need her?. And Eastwood insists on dragging the movie out until the last creaky turn of the wheel of justice, when a simple end-crawl would have sufficed.

I give him credit for his precise casting: the movie is filled with great faces from the 1920s, all creating a convincing milieu (notably, detectives Jeffrey Donovan and Michael Kelly, and bad-guy Jason Butler Harner). Props to the character actors!!

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Quick takes pre-awards season

I want to post these brief reviews before a) the onslaught of end-of-year blockbusters; and b) my annual critique of the Golden Globe nominations.

Let's start with two foreign films:

I've Loved You So Long
(FRANCE)
This film is dominated by an award-worthy performance by Kristin Scott-Thomas as a just-released convicted murderer who goes to live with her estranged younger sister and her multi-cultural family: sis and her husband adopted two Vietnamese girls--I don't know why I note that fact, except that the two girls are quite annoying. [The title, apparently, comes from a French lullaby.] Scott-Thomas completely drains herself of all charm, beauty and emotion to inhabit this role -- quite fearless for an actress who (in my eyes) always appears charming and beautiful, if a bit cool emotionally. See The English Patient. But it is not a scenery-chewing role. You have to wait until the end for a big emotional outburst; in the meantime, the characters and the lives they inhabit are so real that you come to care about what happens to them.

Just as good as Scott-Thomas is Elsa Zylberstein as younger sis Lea. She brings just barely to the surface all the conflicting feelings of a sibling who is both trying hard to reconnect with a sister she still looks up to, while still harboring resentment for her abandonment. Other actresses would try to out-act her co-star; Elsa reveals her character in the small moments that make it all the more powerful.

Let the Right One In
(SWEDEN)
Consider this vampire movie the "anti-Twilight." First, the two leads are quite ordinary-looking tweeners, not the tabloid-ready, pretty faces of the Twilight teens. Second, this movie reminds you that feasting on human blood to survive is very messy business. Grisly and gruesome, too. Finally, it takes place among the working class denizens of stark apartment blocks, cold cafes, and frozen streets of urban Sweden (I didn't catch in which city it takes place). Not something Bergman ever showed us.

Sounds rather bleak, doesn't it? Still, I walked out afterwards both impressed by the filmmaker's technique and moved by the story. Except for a couple of cheap special effects, the scenes are artfully filmed (if you aren't turned off by throat-slitting, decapitation, and a pack of angry cats!) I was very pleased with the performance of the cats in this film: most of these movies use pets only as quick snacks for a thirsty vampire. Here, the cats -- with the aid of some discreet animation -- are the aggressors against the undead. They mean business, too!

The story involves a lonely boy with divorced parents who is the victim of bullying at school. He forms a friendship with the at-first reluctant neighbor who is a loner like him, but unlike him, she can take care of herself and instills in him the courage to do the same. They form a trusting and accepting friendship that leads to an inevitable conclusion. As a side story, the sad sack adults who unwittingly get caught up in all of this violence do not fare well at all: one-by-one they get murdered or bitten, yet they show a strange reluctance to seek the aid of the Police! Unwitting and witless, perhaps, but you still feel sorry for them.

Next up:
Changeling (Dir: Clint Eastwood)
Happy-Go-Lucky (Dir: Mike Leigh)

Monday, November 17, 2008

Vera Farmiga

The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas
Dir: Mark Herman (2008)
I will go to see Vera Farmiga in just about anything.* She is destined for Cate Blanchett-like greatness. I even plan to rent her first breakout role in the indie "Down to the Bone." I say this to explain what would make me go to this troubling concept film: an adaptation of a children's novel that deals with the Holocaust from the point of view of a privileged German child. Touchy material, to say the least. I myself am very wary of any depictions of World War II atrocities in the context of an 'entertainment' (see, or better yet, don't see, Miracle at St. Anna). And I cannot argue with people who find this movie morally reprehensible -- except for those critics who feel so high and mighty they break the cardinal rule of movie-reviewing by revealing the ending!! (Don't worry, I gave the NY Times' Manohla Dargis a piece of my mind!) But I am not one of those people -- I found it powerful and moving.
I am using the proper British title, per IMDB, because this is a veddy British production down to its core: all the Germans speak with British accents which, once you resign yourself to this anachronism, isn't as distracting as I would have thought (at least all the accents are consistently British). And the story moves down a conventional path: family of Nazi officer leaves their secluded life in Berlin to move next door to a concentration camp, and predictably lose their illusions about the world they live in. (It takes them a surprisingly long time, considering they moved next to a CONCENTRATION CAMP!!) True, this is a story told from the point-of-view of an eight-year-old, but at times you want to tell the kid to "wise-up already!!"

He does eventually wise up, but the payoff is so emotionally powerful and gut-wrenching ... while at the same time doing justice to the unspeakable horror of the millions of victims this movie had previously ignored ... that I do not feel bad recommending it for its small contribution to our collective memory.

This is the film that made Vera famous!


* I make an exception for "Joshua," because I am so sick of movies about creepy & evil little boys... The Omen, The Omen: II, Damian: Omen III....enough already!

Brad Pitt's two most recent movies reviewed

The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford
Dir: Andrew Dominik (2007)

I am kicking myself for not seeing this film the year it was released (I caught it last night on Cinemax). It would definitely have made my Top Ten. It is an evocative, moody period piece that takes its place alongside other notable 'modern' Westerns that revitalized the genre: from Unforgiven to Deadwood. My one sentence synopsis would be "Deadwood, starring Brad Pitt!"

I don't mean that as a slight, either. Brad Pitt is amazing as the iconic Jesse James--another tormented anti-hero who has reached a level of notoriety where he mistrusts everyone. (If it reminds you of Keith Carradine's excellent turn as Wild Bill Hickock in Deadwood, it should: the movie captures the same zeitgeist perfectly). Also like that HBO series, the film's supporting cast is without flaw -- a who's who of indie character actors: starting with memorable Deadwood alum Garret Dillahunt; Sam Rockwell (Choke); Paul Schneider (Lars & the Real Girl); a sadly-wasted Mary Louise Parker as Mrs. Jesse James; and Sam Shepard in a cameo as older brother Frank.

It is a shame Casey Affleck turned in his performance of a lifetime the same year as Javier Bardem's Anton Chigura in No Country: he inhabits the character even more than he did in his other breakthrough performance in last year's Gone Baby Gone. And kudos to the director, an obscure New Zealander who brought Eric Bana to these shores in Chopper. I wish I had been on board this movie from the start.


Burn After Reading
Dirs: Joel & Ethan Coen (2008)

For every Big Lebowski there has to be a Barton Fink.

That is the immutable rule of the Coen Brothers comic universe: you stomach the bad (Fink) in anticipation of the classic (Lebowski). For one Raising Arizona, Hudsucker Proxy, Fargo, and O Brother, Where Art Thou?, you have to sit through the dreck of The Ladykillers and Burn Without Reading. In spite of its A-list cast (George Clooney and Frances McDormand are comic masters--Tilda Swinton cannot do much with a one-note role), Burn is just that: another mean-spirited look at a collection of losers who are not so much funny as pathetic. That doesn't stop the Coens from holding them up to ridicule and then pulling the rug out from under the audience for sympathizing with them.

For a supposed comedy, I didn't laugh out loud once until the very end of the movie, where character-actor par excellence J.K. Simmons delivers some hilarious lines at CIA headquarters. That and the authentic DC locales (where I used to jog in George Clooney's footsteps! ... or his in mine, more accurately) are the only redeemable features.

But this post is about Brad Pitt, so I have to comment on his performance. I took alot of heat in some quarters for saying this about a long-forgotten Matt Dillon role, but I think it applies even more to Mr. Pitt: He is too smart an actor to play dumb. He is!! He doesn't give a bad performance so much as an unconvincing one (like he's trying too hard). I can only hope he proves my point with an award-worthy performance in the much-anticipated Benjamin Button.





Honestly, doesn't he strike a more iconic, larger than life, movie star pose in the picture at the left than the one on the right? (I'm just saying .... )

Tuesday, November 04, 2008

Rachel Getting Married
Dir: Jonathan Demme (2008)


It is hard to describe the premise of this movie without making you think of a dozen other movies: main character returns home for a big family get together, and all hell breaks loose as past resentments and buried dysfunctions come to the surface. It's usually a holiday (Thanksgiving--Home for the Holidays; Christmas--The Family Stone, just to name two), but a wedding works just as well: remember "Margot at the Wedding"? Of course you don't--NO ONE saw it!! (despite my glowing review).

RGM is a better movie than Margot, because it has a heart. Nicole Kidman gave a brave, uncompromising performance as a selfish, uncaring sister in the latter, but Anne Hathaway is even better...as a selfish, uncaring, but damaged sister Kym to Rachel. It is her Best Performance since "Becoming Jane." Seriously! She is totally believable as an addict recently released from rehab. In a revealing scene at the rehearsal dinner, everyone toasts the bride and groom--except Kim, whose toast is all about herself. Who hasn't had that happen at a family gathering? (foreignfilmguy is naming no names.)

The movie is filled with a multi-cultural stew of relatives, friends, entertainers and wedding traditions. That is refreshing -- up to a point. The movie never explains why this inter-racial marriage of a white, suburban Connecticut bride to an African-American groom had a Hindi wedding ceremony. And don't get me started on the reception! They hired enough entertainers for 5 receptions! Jamaican singers, jazz, samba dancers, even Robyn Hitchcock shows up, for Pete's sake! (I thought that dude was dead.) The family is all upset when the estranged mother (played by a radiant Debra Winger) decides to skip out. I'm thinking "I'm with you, Deb!"

A note on casting: Bill Irwin--Great as the Dad who is the emotional, nurturing core of the family (another refreshing surprise); Rosemarie Dewitt--Great as Rachel (and the spitting image of a young Debra Winger!); in fact, the only bland character at this shindig proves to be the Groom. Sydney is a real Dud.

But the positives far outweigh my negatives. Jonathan Demme has fashioned one of the Ten Best Movies of the Year. Go see it.


Anne Hathaway did NOT wear this to Rachel's wedding (thank goodness!)

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Miracle at St. Anna
Dir: Spike Lee (2008)

Spike Lee has achieved what he has been dreaming about all his life: he has made a WWII movie centered on black soldiers that is just as bad as the ones Hollywood churned out during the war and just after. Trouble is, we are in the next century already! The war movie has been refined a bit since the 1940s (but apparently the only war movie Spike has seen since then is "Saving Private Ryan" (because he borrows from it shamelessly). His longtime music collaborator, Terrence Blanchard, uncharacteristically follows suit: his soundtrack is chock-full of every rehashed, hackneyed musical motif from all of those war movies combined! (This from the man who gave us the original and electrifying musical background to last year's "Inside Man." I wouldn't expect him to lay an egg, too.)

I will not start at the beginning, because the 'framing device' of a story set in the present is so mishandled that it rivals the other worse parts of the movie. The initial battle action faced by this unit of all-black soldiers is straight out of the first half-hour of Spielberg's SPR. Then Lee reverts to standard, cliche-driven hokum (also a feature of SPR) as we get to know the four members of group who are stranded on the wrong side of an Italian river. Individually, these young and mostly unknown actors are convincing, even likeable. I do not doubt for a minute the racism they endured in the US Army and in American society as a whole, either. But Lee's depiction of this racism is so ham-handed and obvious that it is embarrassing to watch. [For a parallel, see mentor Spielberg (again) in his absolute worst movie: "The Color Purple."]

But that's not the worst part of the movie. At the movie's centerpiece is an atrocity committed by the Nazis in a Tuscan village called Sant'Anna di Stazzema (where the movie was actually filmed): 560 civilians were gunned-down by the retreating SS. An unspeakable act that needs to be remembered and the lives of those victims honoured. For this sequence, I would have applauded Lee for taking a page from Spielberg's note-perfect "Schindler's List" on the proper, respectful way to depict such an atrocity in an entertainment vehicle. Instead, he treats it with all the subtlety (and historical accuracy) of Roland Emmerich's "The Patriot," i.e., none. (You remember that detestable Revolutionary War pic (with Mel Gibson & Heath Ledger), that had the nerve to depict the British soldiers on an equal plane of depravity as the Nazis!)

Here, Lee has come under fire from Italian survivors for inventing a character of a turncoat partisan who plays a part in the massacre. It is justified fire, from what I have read: it is these peoples' history, after all. They deserve to have it told to the world accurately. My beef is in the way Lee points his unblinking camera at every bullet-ridden civilian at the point of their murder, and then goes back to give us a shot of 'artfully-posed,' blood-streaked corpses. Most directors know when to show the brutality outright, and when it would be more powerful to show the aftermath. Lee cannot resist showing us both -- every time. The effect is dulling and vulgar. When Lee inevitably shows a crying baby on top of her dead mother, the audience's emotion is not sympathy or dread, it is "I can't believe he is stooping this low" (to show us a baby getting bayoneted). But stoop he literally does: you guessed it, he films the hovering Nazi from the perspective of the baby!

But that's not the worst part of the movie! Remember the framing device I said I wouldn't mention? Not only does it make a long movie interminable, it is filled with the worst collection of 'look-at-who-my-friends-are' cameos since Burt Reynolds hung up his car keys! Every one of them is out-of-place and completely unnecessary to the plot: John Turturro, ___ Gordon-Levitt, Kerry Washington, but especially, ESPECIALLY the pointless appearance by John Leguizamo! Somebody please explain to me why his scene was ever necessary? It ends with his newspaper flying out the window and landing on a key character's table. Why couldn't that character have just BOUGHT THE FREAKIN' PAPER! (I just saved five minutes of screen time, right there). Sheesh, Spike, sheesh ....

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Sacred & Profane

Religulous
(D: Larry Charles; 2008)
This is the sacred one

You know Larry Charles: he's the guy who forced "Borat" on an unsuspecting world. He's at it again--making fun of unsuspecting fools, that is. I suppose it is tempting to appear on camera, no matter the circumstance (why else would people still agree to sit with a 'Daily Show' correspondent?). But the technique -- which can be amusing up to a point -- soon becomes tedious. And its more of the same here: why make a thoughtful critique of religion in today's society when you can just make fun of the wingnuts?

This movie is a veritable parade of wingnuts. I don't blame Bill Maher--he is a comedian first, so it is natural for him to go for the joke every chance he gets. But time after time, all we get are snippets of interviews with the most extreme members of one faith or another (Christians, Muslims, Jews, pot smokers) . Even the serious commentators who agreed to appear (scientist Francis X. Collins is the only one who comes to mind) get the same treatment: anytime anyone comes close to thoughtfully challenging Maher's premise, the movie quick-cuts to Mormon cartoons or an evangelical/Godspell song-and-dance number.

In the most-egregious example of this technique, the filmmakers send a film crew all the way to Vatican City, yet don't bother to find a more competent advocate of the Catholic faith than some nut Maher interviews on the street!

The best part of the movie comes towards the end, when Maher goes to the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Here I actually learn something--but it comes much too late to save this picture. In what should be the movie's strong point, the equivalent of Maher's closing "Real Time" essay, where he looks into the camera and delivers a scathing attack on the latest outrage of the day, is undermined by this hack director, who insists on diverting our attention with an MTV-montage of violence and extremism (which we are supposed to take "on faith" was religion-inspired) while Maher's point is completely drowned out. If Charles was striving for a "call to action" moment, like the end of "An Inconvenient Truth," he fails miserably. If Charles thinks he can clone the Michael Moore formula, he has only left out the intelligence, the wit, and the courage to confront an issue head-on.

Now for the good stuff . . . The Profane:

Choke
(D: Stuart Gregg; 2008)

The author of "Fight Club" penned this outrageous look at a sex addict who works in a Williamsburg-type colonial village by day, and by night cons people into giving him money after they save his life by performing the Heimlich maneuver on him (and in-between visits his mother in a mental institution). That's the best synopsis I can give, but it fails to convey the hilarious sordidness of the piece. This guy--and the people he interacts with -- are real losers! But the creators of this indie hit have an obvious fondness for these oh-so damaged characters, which is conveyed in every committed, whacked-out performance: from Sam Rockwell in the lead, to the great Anjelica Huston as the deranged mother, to Kelly Macdonald (last seen in "No Country For Old Men"), down to the perfect supporting turns by Heather Burns ("Miss Congeniality I & II"), newcomer Gillian Jacobs (as a stripper named Cherry Daiquiri--"not her real name") and the director himself. You might not have heard of this movie--it is not to everyone's taste--but neither was "Fight Club". . . and you remember the first rule of Fight Club, don't you?

Tropic Thunder
(D: Ben Stiller, 2008)
(Profane, part II)

The summer comedy blockbuster of the year!
Ben Stiller nails it, in his scathing send-up of all of our worst fears about Hollywood's egotism, excess, greed, and crassness. To wit: Actors are pompous asses, and so is everyone else in Hollywood! No, that's not a revelation, but never has it been driven home so relentlessly. Outrageous and offensive it is -- but it has to be! Not since Austin Powers (I) has a comedy been this silly, daring, ridiculous and laugh-out-loud funny throughout.

For better or worse, Stiller has developed his craft at the feet of the Farrelly Brothers, which becomes obvious in the movie's most controversial segment (repeated references to the leading man's role in a movie as a mentally-challenged man, in a blatant attempt to earn an Oscar). But the at-times uncomfortable laughs are at the expense of an industry that will exploit anyone, not at the expense of the so-called 'retarded.'

Yes, Tom Cruise is great in a supporting role --I've known that since "magnolia." It is Robert Downey, Jr. who steals the show, however, proving to be equally adept at comedy as he is at drama (witness last year's "Zodiac.")

Friday, October 10, 2008

Vicky Christina Barcelona
D: Woody Allen (2008)

Here's the funny thing--it turns out I liked Vicky better than Christina or Barcelona! That's not what I expected from the reviews, trailers, even the poster: Vicky is barely in any of them (if at all). Yet Vicky (played by British stage actress Rebecca Hall) has more screen time than either of the two female leads: Scarlett Johansson (the titular Christina) or Penelope Cruz (Maria Elena). What I really like about her is that she's uptight, intellectual, and brunette--a combination I have never been able to resist.
Christina, on the other hand, is blonde, flirty, and can't hold her liquor.

In her defense, who wouldn't jump at the chance to spend a weekend in the Spanish countryside with Javier Bardem? (I mean it beats 'Rodanthe'-- I don't even know where that is!!) As for the third woman in this love quadrangle, Woody Allen makes us wait a good hour before Penelope Cruz even makes an appearance! It is effective in one sense: after all the anticipation, she blazes a hole in the screen when she arrives and shakes up their world.

[SIDEBAR: I can't think of another foreign actress who is so markedly better in her native tongue than she is in English. If you need proof (and have Netflix), rent Abre los ojos, Vanilla Sky, Volver, and Woman on Top -- and watch them back-to-back-to-back. I dare you!!]

The movie unfolds as an adult exploration of love, passion, fear, and perpetual dissatisfaction with life... all the uncomfortable issues you expect in a Woody Allen film. I must say, getting him out of Manhattan has really rejuvenated his filmmaking.

On the other hand (there is always another hand) the film's drawbacks are apparent: Penelope Cruz is so good, you wish the movie were about her! Her scenes with Bardem show such untapped potential: that is the core relationship in the movie -- I wish it had been explored more. (How often do you get the 'King & Queen of Spanish Cinema' in the same movie, after all!) Second, the narration is rather bland. I don't know if its the fault of the script or the narrator, but if you are going to use that device, why not use it to its full advantage by providing some insight? Third, the climactic scene is somewhat of a dud, even though the movie ends on a satisfactory, wistful note that remains consistent with the overall tone of the film. And the too-few scenes of Barcelona's landmarks look strangely washed out.

Back to the first hand, the Spanish guitar-heavy soundtrack is awesome!! It really puts you in the place. (The opening theme alone is worth the price of admission). Book my flight now! (as soon as the dollar rebounds).

Rebecca Hall at Cannes

Saturday, September 27, 2008

An all-Czech weekend!

DATELINE - Austin, Texas - Sept. 27th:

Another 'Post From the Road', again at my favorite coffeehouse in Austin (Halcyon on W. 4th St.). Why am I in Austin, you ask?? To see the stars of last year's indie hit -- and Oscar* winner -- "Once," of course! (Not once, but twice!)

Yesterday I saw the band known as "The Swell Season" (featuring Irish musician Glenn Hansard & Czech singer Marketa Irglova) in an abbreviated, 45-minute set, hampered by sound and equipment difficulties, at the 7th Annual Austin City Limits Festival -- my first visit to this renowned event (the closest I will have to a Woodstock experience, since I am too old for 'Burning Man.')

I also heard complete sets by David Byrne and Patty Griffin, and sampled songs from Alejandro Escovedo, Jenny Lewis (Rilo Kiley), the Freddy Jones Band (from Chicago? never heard of them), and Jakob Dylan (sounds just like his dad!)

Tonight I will be seeing a more complete set by the Swells at the historic Paramount Theater in downtown Austin. Set lists for both shows will follow, as will my review of the Sunday matinee of the film "I Served the King of England," by noted Czech director Jiri Menzel. That will make it 3 Czech artists in 3 days! (In Central Texas, where Czech immigrants settled in the 19th Century).
I think I'll stop for a kolache on my drive back to Houston!

* TM